2.8: NodeDB refactor to decouple satellite entries and decrease size

This commit is contained in:
Ben Meadors
2026-05-07 08:37:56 -05:00
parent cdc47a2aea
commit f5c2c99150
53 changed files with 2241 additions and 523 deletions
+6 -6
View File
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ bool KeyVerificationModule::handleReceivedProtobuf(const meshtastic_MeshPacket &
cn->which_payload_variant = meshtastic_ClientNotification_key_verification_number_request_tag;
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_request.nonce = currentNonce;
strncpy(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_request.remote_longname, // should really check for nulls, etc
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->user.long_name,
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->long_name,
sizeof(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_request.remote_longname));
service->sendClientNotification(cn);
LOG_INFO("Received hash2");
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool KeyVerificationModule::handleReceivedProtobuf(const meshtastic_MeshPacket &
cn->which_payload_variant = meshtastic_ClientNotification_key_verification_final_tag;
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.nonce = currentNonce;
strncpy(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.remote_longname, // should really check for nulls, etc
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->user.long_name,
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->long_name,
sizeof(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.remote_longname));
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.isSender = false;
service->sendClientNotification(cn);
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ meshtastic_MeshPacket *KeyVerificationModule::allocReply()
cn->which_payload_variant = meshtastic_ClientNotification_key_verification_number_inform_tag;
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_inform.nonce = currentNonce;
strncpy(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_inform.remote_longname, // should really check for nulls, etc
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->user.long_name,
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->long_name,
sizeof(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_inform.remote_longname));
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_number_inform.security_number = currentSecurityNumber;
service->sendClientNotification(cn);
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ void KeyVerificationModule::processSecurityNumber(uint32_t incomingNumber)
LOG_WARN("received security number: %u", incomingNumber);
meshtastic_NodeInfoLite *remoteNodePtr = nullptr;
remoteNodePtr = nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode);
if (remoteNodePtr == nullptr || !remoteNodePtr->has_user || remoteNodePtr->user.public_key.size != 32) {
if (!nodeInfoLiteHasUser(remoteNodePtr) || remoteNodePtr->public_key.size != 32) {
currentState = KEY_VERIFICATION_IDLE;
return; // should we throw an error here?
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ void KeyVerificationModule::processSecurityNumber(uint32_t incomingNumber)
hash.update(&currentRemoteNode, sizeof(currentRemoteNode));
hash.update(owner.public_key.bytes, owner.public_key.size);
hash.update(remoteNodePtr->user.public_key.bytes, remoteNodePtr->user.public_key.size);
hash.update(remoteNodePtr->public_key.bytes, remoteNodePtr->public_key.size);
hash.finalize(hash1, 32);
hash.reset();
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ void KeyVerificationModule::processSecurityNumber(uint32_t incomingNumber)
cn->which_payload_variant = meshtastic_ClientNotification_key_verification_final_tag;
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.nonce = currentNonce;
strncpy(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.remote_longname, // should really check for nulls, etc
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->user.long_name,
nodeDB->getMeshNode(currentRemoteNode)->long_name,
sizeof(cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.remote_longname));
cn->payload_variant.key_verification_final.isSender = true;
service->sendClientNotification(cn);